Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark McCaughey (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jayjg ^(talk) 22:16, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mark McCaughey

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of meeting WP:BIO, I couldn't find any reliable sources on google to back the claims in the article, thus fail WP:V as well, article was kept the first time primarily with faulty rationales, and lack of discussion Delete Secret ^account 19:30, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Article fails WP:ATHLETE on its own: he is portrayed as an "amateur", which goes against, "People who have competed at the fully professional level of a sport, or a competition of equivalent standing in a non-league sport such as swimming, golf or tennis;" or "People who have competed at the highest amateur level of a sport, usually considered to mean the Olympic Games or World Championships." On another side, Ghits and Gnews hits are extremely lacking, and I can't find any reliable secondary sources which discuss him. Fails both WP:N and WP:ATHLETE. Angryapathy (talk) 22:23, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. No evidence of notability whatsoever. NBeale (talk) 23:41, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete amateur racer and not even particularly notable by amateur standards -Drdisque (talk) 00:24, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Mark McCaughey

zproxy.org